Hello there.
Over the past couple of weeks there has been a definite change in the perception of paparazzi pictures around the world. Holy Moly has been fairly vocal in its criticism of the pack of LA photographers who are to all intents and purposes following a mentally ill woman around all day. This has led to a fair number of you (quite rightly) questioning our own use of pictures...
We've had a good old natter over here at HM HQ and have come to the following conclusions:
GOOD!
- Celebrities who attend premieres, launches, award ceremonies & press conferences are all fair game.
- As are idiots who go to places like The Ivy, Nobu et al for a "quiet bite to eat".
- Likewise Chinawhites, Mahiki blah blah blah.
- Any blatant photo opportunity (I'm looking at you Victoria Beckham and you Kerry Katona) where tip offs are given by the celebrity to the paparazzi.
BAD!
- Celebrities with their kids.
- Pursuing people in cars and on bikes.
- People in distress at being photographed.
- Not "on duty".
If we've missed any out I'm sure our ever vocal readers will be sure to let us know.
We're going to do our best to stick to this, because lets face it, when one of the biggest names in paparazzi
jacks it in due to ethics and morals and the worlds biggest pop star gets her knickers photographed by 30 people an hour after being released from a mental institute, you KNOW there's a problem on the shop floor.
Ta.
nb. Not sure if this applies to Sienna Miller yet though.