HEATHER MILLS' EVIDENCE LESS THAN ACCURATE
NO WONDER SHE WANTED IT KEPT QUIET
|
Published on Tue 18 March 2008 by HOLYMOLY!
|
HEATHER MILLS' EVIDENCE LESS THAN ACCURATE |
Well it's straight from the horse's mouth. The judge presiding over the divorce of Paul McCartney and Heather Mills has released the details of the hearing and they pretty much sum up a nation's thoughts - that she is completely batshit.
An excerpt:
15. The husband’s evidence was, in my judgment, balanced. He expressed himself moderately though at times with justifiable irritation, if not anger. He was consistent, accurate and honest.Download the full document after the jump...
16. But I regret to have to say I cannot say the same about the wife’s evidence. Having watched and listened to her give evidence, having studied the documents, and having given in her favour every allowance for the enormous strain she must have been under (and in conducting her own case) I am driven to the conclusion that much of her evidence, both written and oral, was not just inconsistent and inaccurate but also less than candid. Overall she was a less than impressive witness.
FOR THE FULL TRANSCRIPT CLICK HERE!
|
|
|
|
IT MUST BE LOVE OUT, DAMNED CLOT! NEWSMOUND IT WAS ME, MINI-ME THE RAT IS BACK |
BIG BOY VERSUS WILD CHILD MY DIGNITY'S ON THE FLOOR FIXED RATE LOHAN BALL-GAME THREES A CROWD |
| COMMENTS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
