RightRoyalBastard on Thu 12 June 2008 said... OP. Fuck off. No really. Fuck Off. If you think this whole resignation thing is anything other than a PR stunt then fucking hell Bambi you're set for some real disappointments in life.
SaleoftheCentury on Thu 12 June 2008 said... Since when has this prick ever given a fuck about the erosion of civil liberties.... Jesus. Hello RRB, is the wife reading this or something?
RightRoyalBastard on Thu 12 June 2008 said... I'm as surprised as you are Sale. Still, it makes a nice change to agree on something, means we can call other people cunts if they agree with the OP, the deluded spaz.
JiggeryCock on Thu 12 June 2008 said... Silly cunt. The adoption of 42-days (or more) detention without trial for terrorist suspects is the ONE piece of government legislation that is in tune with public opinion. I bet Gordon Brown is licking his slobbery sea-lion chops at the thought of having this as lead news item for the next few months.
BlartMonster on Thu 12 June 2008 said... A politician making a stand for what he believes in will usually have a string very firmly attached to it. I wouldn't trust that cunt if he told me it was night-time; i'd still look outside to make sure
angrymike on Thu 12 June 2008 said... Firstly his seat is a tory stronghold so he has no risk of losing it to labour in the by election, not only that be he's agreed a deal with the lib dems for them to not field a candidate in the by election, just in case. so basically all he's doing is wasting the country money in making the need to have a meaningless by election. Yes well done David Davies you fucking stupid tory cunt. it would have been perfectly possible for him to make a stand in other ways (like vote against the bill) what he's doing isn't making a stand it's just fannying about to get publicity
hamstir on Thu 12 June 2008 said... what angrymike said with a cherry on top
MrsMoon on Thu 12 June 2008 said... Right nasty fucker...ergh! OP, are you in a maximum security hospital?
RightRoyalBastard on Thu 12 June 2008 said... One can only hope MrsM...
dandyboy on Thu 12 June 2008 said... I'm sure he's smiling away at all the publicity he's stirred up already (Davis that is, not the OP. He's only been noticed by about 15 moles with not enough work to do.)
slinkybackrinkadink on Thu 12 June 2008 said... Yes, what a 'stand' he's made. Perhaps he could (as angrymike said) have just voted against.
SaleoftheCentury on Thu 12 June 2008 said... David Davis is an only child, starved of attention and pissed off cos his more popular 'cousin' went to a posh school and getzs all the attention. Fucking working class tories really piss me off.
GayBowelSyndrome on Thu 12 June 2008 said... Did he blow up his suicide belt in Parliment?
dandyboy on Thu 12 June 2008 said... Why the fuck have the Lib Dems decided not to oppose him? I know it's not in my constituency but if it was I'd be mighty pissed off at not being given the choice. People think politicians are all the same as it is, without making agreements as to whether they'll stand against each other because they agree on one fucking policy. I hope the seat is won by some local who campaigns about the local footpaths or something.
MerylHighground on Thu 12 June 2008 said... This has made my day - everyone on here ranting about something of real substance, instead of the Wayne and Colleen cuntery. Believing the motives of a Tory on a humanitarian issue is a bit like believing why Pete Townshend would volunteer to man the phones for Childline.
angrymike on Thu 12 June 2008 said... The lib dems have decided not to oppose him because they know they probably won't win and wouldn't want a freak result due to their splitting the vote to let labour get another seat. it's a complete fucking joke. Resign, get relected, the status quo is restored. All so the tories can then say "LOOK THE GENERAL POPULACE DON'T SUPPORT THE 42 DAY LIMIT EITHER!!!!! THAT IS WHY THE SAME PEOPLE WHO VOTED HIM IN BEFORE HAVE VOTED HIM IN AGAIN!!!" making labour look bad. you see it's bullshit like this why i don't vote. more specifically it's bullshit like this that makes me go to the polling stations on election day, wipe my arse with the ballot paper and then shove it in the box. All politicians everywhere are complete and utter cunts. wanting to be a member of parliament should automatically disqualify anyone from running for MP, wanting to be prime minister should automatically disaqualify them from being allowed to breath.
angrymike on Thu 12 June 2008 said... sorry that went on a little longer than it maybe should have.
catterina88 on Thu 12 June 2008 said... OP, you are a fucking useless, ignorant, stupid twat. Don't you understand how politics and politicians work? 'Standing up for what he believes in'? Get fucking fucked, you complete and utter wankstain.
BustySinclair on Thu 12 June 2008 said... Nice rant Angrymike.
angrymike on Thu 12 June 2008 said... ta very much busty.
cockend on Thu 12 June 2008 said... angrymike-wise words mate.
libertyvalance2008 on Thu 12 June 2008 said... Is he the one with funny jumpers that likes bottoms instead of mimsies ? Im DickyM by the way im just using this ID because my account ("hasn't been blocked by us") has been blocked by Mr HM.
BustySinclair on Thu 12 June 2008 said... Howdy DM. Recognised the pic.
libertyvalance2008 on Thu 12 June 2008 said... shhhh busty DM was a secret, he really did get banned for being naughty. Fuck knows what happened with dickym though.
slinkybackrinkadink on Thu 12 June 2008 said... angrymike, you're just talking too much sense. angrymike for PM!
slinkybackrinkadink on Thu 12 June 2008 said... PS- Again DickyM, why not DickyN? We would have got it.
libertyvalance2008 on Thu 12 June 2008 said... Cause my very first was libertyvalance2002 and so on but they were all banned. However dickym commited no crime.....Plus thats a fucking cool pic of the man even though I say so myself.
MrBeefy on Thu 12 June 2008 said... If I was him, I'd have changed my first name just as soon as I was old enough. David and Davis? How fucking wank is that?
Frix133 on Thu 12 June 2008 said... I don't give a shit if it was a stunt. The only party backing Labour in the by-election are the BNP. Why? Because they hate foreigners, so would love to lock a few up for whatever reason, and everyone else is sick of Labour. I'm sick of life under Labour (I voted them in time before last, and didn't vote last time, so fuck off any Tory bashers who want to start on me). Glad to see the shit stirring. Roll on the next general election.
cowman on Thu 12 June 2008 said... Anybody that spells it Davis and not Davies is deeply suspicious..
danno on Thu 12 June 2008 said... good work angrymike. Total publicity stunt. Never in any danger of losing his seat. There's a reason that Davies lost the Conservative leadership contest. Because he's a self obsessed fucking liability. And going up against Cameron that's saying something! Only joking, but he's still an offensively patronising wanker.
washinglinethief on Thu 12 June 2008 said... i don't get it. why do you all still hate the tories so much even after over 10 years of taking it in the arse from labour and being continually lied to and paying the highest rate of tax overall eve,r if you include all of the hundreds of new stealth taxes. The tories lost power mainly due to government sleeze but despite that the country was in great shape when labour took over. The difference between tory sleeze and labour sleeze was that the tories (such as Jeffrey Archer and Jonathon aitken) were lying about personal issues which don't affect my life or yours. Surely it is far worse to have a government that continually lies to us about government issues that affect us all such as starting an illegal war which we all pay for everyday. Incidently negative equity is back and this time you can't blame the tories. Grow up and actually look at some of the issues before you automatically decide that if the tories like it it must be wrong.
joylove on Thu 12 June 2008 said... Personally I couldn't give a shit if a Minister wants to dress up like a Gimp and get his ass spanked by a Cheeky Girl, so long as he lowers taxes and doesn't suck shitty dick in the EU/US relations.
joylove on Thu 12 June 2008 said... Personally I couldn't give a shit if a Minister wants to dress up like a Gimp and get his ass spanked by a Cheeky Girl, so long as he lowers taxes and doesn't suck shitty dick in the EU/US relations.
angrymike on Thu 12 June 2008 said... Washinglinethief, i think all politicians are arseholes. i'd say the same if it was a labvour MP donig it. the point is that this is stupid grandstanding to get popularity with the liberal voters. the tories fucked the country up when they were in power now the labour governement is fucknig the country up. all the major political parties are pretty much identical in terms of being run by self obsessed shit stains who don't care about the population but care instead about furthering their own shitty agendas. i'd rather have a sexual deviant who lies about being a sexual deviant in charge than some straight talking honest wanker, as lonfg as the sexual deviant had better policies for running the country
Miki on Fri 13 June 2008 said... Well at least I know what to do with my ballot paper thanks Angrymike.
WeakAtTheKnees on Fri 13 June 2008 said... OP......suck my cock. stupid boy.
fuzzylowhangers on Fri 13 June 2008 said... Meh ... couldn't care what his motivation was, I'd still fuck him.
Sable on Fri 13 June 2008 said... "What he believes in" in this case being the fact that he'd make a better leader of the Tories than Cameron.
jacobsdad on Fri 13 June 2008 said... Well he tried, I would give him that, except for the fact that he intends to force a bi-election but no body in his constituancy wants to stand anyway so he will be realected as a Tory MP and at huge expense. Stupid, stupid boy. Mind you, I hate the Tory's but I'd rather see him leading them than that toffee nosed twat Coconut Cameron.
JiggeryCock on Fri 13 June 2008 said... Here's a thought. No one stands against him except one of the parents of a kid killed in the 7/7 bombings. There's your debate right there. A professional politician with the weight of the party machine behind him versus 'Mr or Mrs Everyman' with all the emotional impetus when it comes to locking up terrorist suspects.
jacobsdad on Fri 13 June 2008 said... Mmmm I see where you're going there, but can you image having an MP who did something for 'the people'? I can't.
Sable on Fri 13 June 2008 said... Is a bi-election where you have to vote on what sexuality you think the candidates are?
Alright on Fri 13 June 2008 said... Fair point JC, but about 7/7, weren’t they all suicide bombers anyway. Not much left too detain regardless of how many days you could of detained them.
Titselinabumsquirter on Fri 13 June 2008 said... And puts himself in a position where he can make no difference whatsoever....yeah what a fucking great plan
ambivalentsquirrell on Fri 13 June 2008 said... Is one less tory (untill the byelection, that is) really such a bad thing?
Jesus on Fri 13 June 2008 said... Ah the Tories, ever the defenders of civil liberties. A fucking PR stunt if ever I saw one. Which makes the OP a stupid, gullible cunt.
washinglinethief on Fri 13 June 2008 said... Does it not occur to any of you that finally someone is trying to bring the issue of how our civil liberties are being systematically taken from us into the spotlight. Instead of criticising we should all be supporting him rather than wandering obediantly like sheep as we are issued with compulsory ID cards with an iris scan, put on DNA data bases when we have committed no crime, are spied on and soon listened to as well by 25% of the world's cctv cameras, issued with speeding fines and parking tickets by intrusive spy camaras and probably soon by satelite as we are charged per mile from the sky for our motoring. He has nothing to gain from this so called publicity stunt on a personal level and in fact is losing his place in the shadow cabinet. l cant believe the level of hatred for the tories considering the shit we have been having to tolerate for the last ten years from the worst government in my living memory, (yes including thatcher)
angrymike on Sat 14 June 2008 said... I can't fairly comment about DNA databases seeing as i'm on there for breaking the law washinglinethief. but yes our civil liberties are beign erroded. i don't think i can comment on thatchers governent either, she resigned when i was only six. It's true that people are abusing the terrorism laws, councils using them to check on parents applying for school places for their kids and how much rubbish people put in their bins. that's is completely immeterial though. davis's stand is not going to make a difference to whether the law is passed ( it'll probably get shit canned in the house of lords anyway) he is making this stand so that people who disagree with the governement on this issue will want to vote tory, maybe he's lost his place in the shadow cabinet. but he'll get re-elected and then get another good job in the shadow governent and when the tories get elected next year by a population who are pissed off by labours cuntishness he'll get a good job in the actual governent. as it stands no party is putting a candidate up to face him he'll get reelected by default and he won't miss out on anything.
kwebb on Sun 15 June 2008 said... I loved World Of Sport - especially the wrestling.
washinglinethief on Sun 15 June 2008 said... Ok fair enough on that angrymike but also these issues have finally been put in the public arena as they should have been a long time ago. Also if he is making these points so that people will vote tory, good i say. The business of the opposition party is to oppose the government whenevr they feel the government is doing undesirable things to the country. If the toies policies are actually in tune with what the british people want then surely it would be mad not to vote for them.
BlartMonster on Mon 16 June 2008 said... Washinglinethief. You're a cunt. And a tory one at that
