SpackoMcDribble on Tue 10 June 2008 said... ..and are therefore un-photogenic? this is a shit rule for arseholes
Bonello on Tue 10 June 2008 said... I feel you OP.
obidel on Tue 10 June 2008 said... they also fall into the big boned category.
MrBeefy on Tue 10 June 2008 said... Bit of a woofer, OP?
kalvaza on Tue 10 June 2008 said... Kind of like saying people who are thick as shit often fail exams. Perhaps OP can relate.
BradNipples on Wed 11 June 2008 said... I think what the OP was trying to say is that ugly people use the un-photogenic card to excuse the fact that they are fuck ugly.... but what do I know, I'm really un-photogenic as you can see!
RightRoyalBastard on Wed 11 June 2008 said... OP, you should have added a proviso. "Except when when under the influence of copious amounts of booze."
FlangeMeister on Wed 11 June 2008 said... Absolute bollocks.In all modesty,I'm a devastatingly handsome chap,but look like a deranged orang-utan in photos.
GayBowelSyndrome on Wed 11 June 2008 said... Beauty is skin deep
MattNazz on Wed 11 June 2008 said... if beauty is skin deep, then paris hilton was turned inside out
MattNazz on Wed 11 June 2008 said... oh, and by the way, it's NON-photogenic, not un-photogenic, ya fuck-knuckle lol
Barbersmith on Wed 11 June 2008 said... This rule is a lot of jizz. As is SaleoftheCentury.
slinkybackrinkadink on Wed 11 June 2008 said... Cameras steal a little bit of your soul every time they take your picture. It's true.
LuciferSam on Wed 11 June 2008 said... To be fair on ugly people, that's not entirely true.
.jpg&fltr[]=f=png&aoe=1&far=C&f=jpeg&bg=000000&h=25&w=25&q=100&down=phpThumb.demo.1.0.jpg)
.jpg&fltr[]=f=png&aoe=1&far=C&f=jpeg&bg=000000&h=25&w=25&q=100&down=phpThumb.demo.1.0.jpg)
